<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Slugger O'Toole | Paul Evans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paul-evans.org/tag/slugger-otoole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paul-evans.org</link>
	<description>“The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool” (As You Like It)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:16:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Labour&#8217;s choice of its enemies</title>
		<link>http://www.paul-evans.org/2015/09/labours-choice-of-its-enemies/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=labours-choice-of-its-enemies</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UK Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slugger O'Toole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Conservative Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labour Party]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paul-evans.org/?p=212</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I wrote this over at Slugger a few days ago. On reflection, its too long, but without a lot of editing, I don&#8217;t know what to leave out. It&#8217;s about how political parties are largely defined by what constrains them. I don&#8217;t think this is understood widely enough. In Labour&#8217;s case, we have the handicap of being [&#8230;]</p>
The post <a href="http://www.paul-evans.org/2015/09/labours-choice-of-its-enemies/">Labour’s choice of its enemies</a> first appeared on <a href="http://www.paul-evans.org">Paul Evans</a>.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.paul-evans.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/labour-logo-400-x-400.png"><img decoding="async" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-213" src="http://www.paul-evans.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/labour-logo-400-x-400-150x150.png" alt="labour logo" width="150" height="150" srcset="http://www.paul-evans.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/labour-logo-400-x-400-150x150.png 150w, http://www.paul-evans.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/labour-logo-400-x-400-300x300.png 300w, http://www.paul-evans.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/labour-logo-400-x-400.png 400w" sizes="(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px" /></a><a href="http://sluggerotoole.com/2015/09/15/labours-choice-of-its-enemies/">I wrote this over at Slugger</a> a few days ago. On reflection, its too long, but without a lot of editing, I don&#8217;t know what to leave out.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about how political parties are largely defined by what constrains them. I don&#8217;t think this is understood widely enough.</p>
<p>In Labour&#8217;s case, we have the <em>handicap</em> of being a fairly democratic party that has, as a main rival, a party that is more capable of opportunism and pragmatism (i.e. The Conservatives).</p>
<p>The post repeats a lot of themes that run through recent posts here &#8211; that good democratic collective action is a great deal harder than most people think.</p>
<p>To defeat the Conservatives, it&#8217;s a massive hill to climb, and it gets bigger when you factor in the problems caused by its openness towards the hard left.</p>The post <a href="http://www.paul-evans.org/2015/09/labours-choice-of-its-enemies/">Labour’s choice of its enemies</a> first appeared on <a href="http://www.paul-evans.org">Paul Evans</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
